we can observe and interpret. language can be composed in innumerable ways to describe the shapes, sounds, movement and interaction of the elements we are exposed to. internal dialog, external dialog, uncertain phrases, translations; we struggle to sort out what truth and fact mean, what lacks clarity or deviates from logical understanding. what appears real and seems plausible, or what has a tangible basis for confirmation.
we have a multitude of observers, interpreters from every angle. the more samples that are collected, a clearer image results. some of the sources may be distorted or foggy, but when overlayed and compiled, the pieces compose a multidimensional construct that represents our reality.
if there were only one sample and that sample was copied and distributed, when reassembled it may also form a coherent image. how can this be considered a reliable reconstruction of reality? both ideas assume the observation is constructed of multiple samples, and in both, the samples come from independent sources. if a single observation is copied and distributed, the rebroadcast of it will most likely be returned as flat noisy picture of that individual copy, rather than a clear and multidimensional entity. like a blurry sketch vs a detailed sculpture.
the more confusion people are exposed to, the more their natural ability to clarify is challenged. therefore, in a world of chaos, the people will become good at developing order. in a world of lies and deception, the people will become good at verifying facts and understanding truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment