The Future

The phrases "in the future" and "by the future" can be interpreted very differently, in terms of time, context, and understanding.

"In the Future"

When we talk about something "in the future," we're often speaking from the present moment, projecting forward. This perspective involves the people, knowledge, and context of the current time. It's rooted in our experiences, assumptions, and biases, and it reflects what we anticipate or hope will occur. For instance, discussing climate change "in the future" might mean speculating on what the world will be like based on today's data and understanding. However, it's still colored by the limitations and uncertainties of current knowledge. It embodies a subjective, human-centric viewpoint because it's built from what we know now and what we think might happen later.

"By the Future"

On the other hand, the phrase "by the future" suggests a perspective where future realities have already unfolded, and we are looking back from a distant vantage point. This implies a kind of historical or omniscient perspective, where all events, choices, and outcomes are known, and only the evidence remains. It's as if the future has already taken place, and what we have is a record of everything that led up to it. This notion feels more objective and detached, focusing on the hard facts of what has occurred rather than on speculative possibilities. 

A Broader Interpretation

These two phrases also suggest different temporal dynamics. "In the future" implies potentiality and evolution—there is room for change, adaptation, and response. "By the future," however, implies finality, where events have been sealed, and outcomes are definitive. 

In essence, "in the future" is about anticipation and expectation, while "by the future" is about reflection and conclusion. Understanding this difference allows us to navigate discussions about time, evidence, and perspective more precisely.